ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2025
Joint Efforts: A Review of Large Joint and Bursa Steroid Injections and Aspirations by Primary Care Physicians.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large joint and bursa steroid injections and aspirations are useful for many musculoskeletal pathologies commonly seen in primary care. However, there is lack of clarity on whether primary care physicians should perform these procedures themselves or refer to specialists. This study reviews the existing literature to explore the impact of primary care physicians performing these procedures. We performed a PubMed search using two search protocols to identify relevant articles. Two investigators independently screened articles for relevance via specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two additional investigators resolved disagreements. We also hand-searched references in all articles. The search methods identified 257 articles, of which 132 met inclusion criteria. Agreement was almost perfect for results from Protocol 1 (kappa = 0.96, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and substantial for Protocol 2 (kappa = 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.94). The results reveal data on primary care physicians performing large joint and bursa steroid injections and aspirations including current trends, management and procedural techniques, outcomes, safety and complication rates, patients' access to treatments, cost differences between primary care versus subspecialty performed procedures, feasibility concerns, training, and patients' perspectives. We conclude there is a benefit to primary care physicians performing these procedures with regards to cost, access, and patient satisfaction with no compromise to outcomes, safety, and complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.