ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Intention-to-Treat Analysis of Hepatic Resection for Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Functions and clinical implications of the liver microenvironment in hepatic uveal melanoma metastases.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma.The British journal of surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUveal melanoma metastasizes to the liver in almost 50% of patients. The prognosis of liver metastases from uveal melanoma (LMUM) is dismal; however, results from retrospective monocentric series suggest that surgery may improve survival in selected patients. We report our results of surgical explorations and hepatic resections for LMUM.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed our prospectively collected institutional database of hepatic resections for LMUM between 2013 and 2023.
resultsIn total, 22 patients underwent surgical exploration (median age 61 years, 41% female patients): 15 (68%) underwent curative-intent surgery (surgery group) while 7 (32%) had their resection aborted owing to intraoperatively unresectable disease (staging alone group). Patients in the surgery group had a longer interval between diagnosis of the primary tumor and LMUM (> 36 months in 64%, versus 29% in the staging alone group, p = 0.18). Preoperative imaging and intraoperative staging were concordant in ten (45%) cases, while five (23%) had more lesions, six (27%) had miliary disease, and one (4.5%) had peritoneal carcinomatosis. Minor postoperative complications occurred in 3 (14%) patients. All patients in the staging alone group underwent subsequent systemic or locoregional treatment. Median overall survival was 27 (15-47) months after surgery and 15 (8-21) months after staging alone. Recurrence after surgery occurred in 7/15 patients, with a median disease-free survival of 28 (4-38) months.
conclusionsMore than 30% of patients with LMUM with preoperatively resectable disease are unresectable at explorative surgery. Acceptable recurrence rates and good survival outcomes are observed when radical surgery can be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.