ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2025
Uptitration of statin therapy in women and men: a population-based cohort study.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrowing sex differences in pharmacotherapy following invasive angiography for coronary artery disease between 2017 and 2024.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular contributions to dementia: Examining sex differences and female-specific factors.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsStatins are widely used for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Women have been shown to be less likely to receive guideline-recommended dose of statins and reach target lipid levels. This study aims to examine sex differences in titration patterns of statin therapy and in the attainment of cholesterol targets in a Dutch healthcare setting. METHODS AND
resultsData on statin dispensing was extracted from the PHARMO Data Network between 2011 and 2020. New-statin users with at least two recorded statin dispenses were included. Cox proportional hazards models were used to study the association between sex and time to first uptitration of intensity and Poisson regressions were used to estimate sex differences in the attainment of cholesterol targets within 6 and 18 months after statin initiation. We identified 68 150 new users of statin therapy (46% women) with a median age of 65 years [Q1-Q3: 57-72]. The cumulative incidence of uptitration after 3 years of follow-up was 10% in women and 12% in men. After adjustment for age, CVD and other individual characteristics, women were 28% less likely to be uptitrated compared to men (adjusted hazard ratio for women vs. men 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.75]). The adjusted risk ratio of achieving cholesterol target levels within 6 and 18 months after statin initiation in women vs. men were 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99).
conclusionAmong new statin users, women are less likely to be uptitrated compared to men and to achieve cholesterol target levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.