Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40246640›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

Developing novel drugs to reverse neuromuscular block: do we need them?

Jennifer M Hunter, Manfred Blobner

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer M HunterUniversity of Liverpool, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: bja@liverpool.ac.uk.
Manfred BlobnerUniversity of Ulm, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 5 yr, rocuronium followed by reversal with sugammadex has become the most common combination of neuromuscular blocking drug and neuromuscular block antagonist in use during anaesthesia in the developed world. Despite a low incidence of side-effects from this drug combination, research continues on the development of new reversal agents. This includes development of new gamma cyclodextrins such as adamgammadex, and unrelated compounds such as calabadion 2 and Pillar[6]MaxQ, that not only sequestrate rocuronium, but also opioids such as fentanyl. The reasons for such work are questioned with the acknowledgement that, as in all areas of anaesthetic practice, the search for perfect drugs continues despite the limited clinical demand.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentNeuromuscular BlockadeNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agentsgamma-CyclodextrinsHumansNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsRocuroniumSugammadexgamma-CyclodextrinsNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsRocuroniumSugammadexadamgammadexcalabadion 2neostigmineneuromuscular blockPillar[6]MaxQreversalsugammadex

Identifiers

PMID40246640
PMCPMC12106867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.