ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Single-cell RNA sequencing of human double-negative T cells reveals a favorable cellular signature for cancer therapy.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Single Cell Analysis Reveals the Transcriptional Heterogeneity of Mouse Double Negative T Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- FAPαAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- CAR-γδ T cells: a new paradigm of programmable innate immune sentinels and their systemic applications in cancer and beyond.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllogeneic double-negative T-cell (DNT) therapy has emerged as a novel, off-the-shelf cellular treatment with clinical feasibility, safety, and promising efficacy against leukemia. However, the biology of DNTs is less well characterized, and how DNT therapy distinguishes from conventional γδ T-cell therapy remains unclear. Collectively, this hinders our ability to bolster DNT functionalities in cancer therapy. Here, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing with in vitro and in vivo functional analysis on DNTs. As a significant proportion of DNTs express Vγ9Vδ2 (Vδ2) TCR chain, we compared DNTs with donor-matched conventional Vδ2 T cells expanded with zoledronic acid.
methodsHealthy donor-derived allogeneic DNTs and Vδ2 T cells were expanded ex vivo. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis was performed on both cellular products to identify the transcriptional landscape and inferred cellular interactions within DNTs, followed by comparisons with donor-matched Vδ2 T cells. Unique cellular subsets found only in DNTs were depleted to identify their contributions to the overall efficacy of DNTs against acute myeloid leukemia. The anti-leukemic activity and in vivo persistence of DNTs and Vδ2 T-cells were explored using flow cytometry-based cytotoxicity assays, memory phenotyping, and xenograft models.
resultsDespite a shared Vδ2 expression between cellular products, we identified unique cellular compositions in DNTs that contribute to distinct transcriptional and cellular communication patterns relative to the donor-matched Vδ2 T cells, including higher expression of genes identified in chimeric antigen receptor T cells that persist in patients with durable cancer-remission. Vδ2
conclusionsThese results highlight the unique transcriptional, cellular, and functional profile of human DNTs and support the continued clinical investigation of allogeneic DNT therapy. The data also provide a reference gene signature that may help improve the efficacy of other types of allogeneic adoptive cellular therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.