ArticleBMJ open2025
Supporting safe disclosure of sexual violence in healthcare settings: findings from a realist evaluation applying candidacy theory through a trauma-focused lens.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting sexual assault disclosure: a qualitative study of women's experiences and preferences in gynaecological and midwifery care in the Netherlands.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Advertising support in healthcare settings for survivors of sexual violence: findings from a population-based survey in England.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMost people who have experienced sexual violence (SV) will disclose the event(s) to someone. Key recipients of disclosure are those working in healthcare, and using sexual and reproductive health services can be an important step in accessing necessary medical care and being signposted to other services. Accessing this care and disclosing SV can be challenging. Evidence is lacking about how best to create a safe environment for disclosure to take place, how services can make changes to better facilitate this experience and what changes matter most.
designRealist evaluation.
settingSexual and reproductive health settings.
participants1-1 interviews with service users who have disclosed SV (n=18), three focus groups with healthcare professionals and survey respondents (n=2007). OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial programme theories of what works, for whom and in what context were tested and refined with empirical data from a national survey, 1-1 interviews and focus groups. The final steps are presented here, bringing strands of the study together and informed using substantive theory.
resultsThe key steps in using healthcare on disclosure of SV relate to self-identification as a worthy candidate irrespective of background or presentation, ensuring empowerment during navigation of services, initial access to sexual healthcare made straightforward, validation by healthcare professionals when receiving disclosures, choice and control for service users during a collaborative interaction with healthcare professionals and aftercare that reflects needs particularly of minoritised groups.
conclusionsWe propose a novel way of considering Dixon-Woods' candidacy theory seen through a trauma-informed lens for healthcare following SV, and how, by holding a trauma-informed lens to candidacy, steps of healthcare access and utilisation can be framed to ensure a safer environment for disclosure. This modified substantive theory marks the chosen endpoint of the realist evaluation and provides a transferable programme theory that can be considered in other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.