Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40246556›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

Touchscreen Response Precision Is Sensitive to the Explore/Exploit Trade-off.

Dana Mueller, Erin Giglio, Cathy S Chen, Aspen Holm, R Becket Ebitz, Nicola M Grissom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-biased computations underlying differential set shift performance in mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dana MuellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.
Erin GiglioDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.
Cathy S ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2506-8522
Aspen HolmDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0315-2281
R Becket EbitzDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada.
Nicola M GrissomDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 ngrissom@umn.edu.

Funding

Using a computational and network neuroscience framework to study pharmacological manipulations of state representation processes in early psychosisP50MH119569 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH, Sophia Vinogradov · 2020 to 2026
$24.5M
NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007234 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Paul G Mermelstein, Jocelyn M Richard · 1986 to 2026
$10.9M
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choiceR01MH123661 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GRISSOM, NICOLA · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Training in genetic and neurobehavioral mechanisms of addictionT32DA050560 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Scott Ian Vrieze · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
Using Computation to Achieve Breakthroughs in NeuroscienceT32MH115886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007234NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA050560NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH119569NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123661NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The explore/exploit trade-off is a fundamental property of choice selection during reward-guided decision making, where the "same" choice can reflect either of these internal cognitive states. An unanswered question is whether the execution of a decision provides an underexplored measure of internal cognitive states. Touchscreens are increasingly used across species for cognitive testing and afford the ability to measure the precise location of choice touch responses. We examined how male and female mice in a restless bandit decision making task interacted with a touchscreen to determine if the explore/exploit trade-off, prior reward, and/or sex differences change the variability in the kinetics of touchscreen choices. During exploit states, successive touch responses are closer together than those made in an explore state, suggesting exploit states reflect periods of increased motor stereotypy. Although exploit decisions might be expected to be rewarded more frequently than explore decisions, we find that immediate past reward reduces choice variability independently of explore/exploit state. Male mice are more variable in their interactions with the touchscreen than females, even in low-variability trials such as exploit or following reward. These results suggest that as exploit behavior emerges in reward-guided decision making, all mice become less variable and more automated in both their choice and the actions taken to make that choice, but this occurs on a background of increased male variability. These data uncover the hidden potential for touchscreen decision making tasks to uncover the latent neural states that unite cognition and movement.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingExploratory BehaviorRewardTouchAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSex Characteristicsbandithidden Markov model (HMM)reinforcement learningsex differencestouchscreen

Identifiers

PMID40246556
PMCPMC12061356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.