Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40246546›Full record

Trial reportAesthetic surgery journal2025

VYC-25L Is Safe and Effective for Enhancing the Chin and Jawline by Correcting Chin Retrusion in Chinese Adults.

Yun Xie, Qingfeng Li, Hongyi Zhao, Zuoliang Qi, Jiaming Sun, Qian Tan, Dong Li, Zhiqi Hu, Ziyang Liu, Smita Chawla

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04559984 (A Randomized, Multicenter, "No-Treatment" Control Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUX® Injectable Gel for the Enhancement of the Chin to Correct Moderate to Severe Retrusion in Chinese Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04559984 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Multicenter, "No-Treatment" Control Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLUX® Injectable Gel for the Enhancement of the Chin to Correct Moderate to Severe Retrusion in Chinese Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2020 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsChin RetrusionArmsJUVÉDERM VOLUX®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yun Xie
Qingfeng Li
Hongyi Zhao
Zuoliang Qi
Jiaming Sun
Qian Tan
Dong Li
Zhiqi Hu
Ziyang Liu
Smita Chawla

Funding

AbbVie companyAllergan Aesthetics
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with chin retrusion may seek chin and lower jawline aesthetic enhancement.

objectivesTo evaluate VYC-25L (Juvéderm Volux XC; Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie company), a lidocaine-containing injectable hyaluronic acid dermal filler, for chin retrusion correction.

methodsIn this prospective, Phase 3, multicenter study (NCT04559984), Chinese adults with moderate-to-severe chin retrusion on the China (Allergan) Chin Retrusion Scale (CACRS) and glabella-subnasale-pogonion (G-Sn-Pog) angle <172.5° were randomized 2:1 to VYC-25L (treatment plus optional touch-up 4 weeks later) or no treatment (control). The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in G-Sn-Pog angle at Week 24. Secondary endpoints included CACRS response (≥1-point improvement), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) response (improved/much improved), and FACE-Q Satisfaction with Chin score. Procedural pain was rated (0 = none to 10 = worst imaginable); injection-site responses (ISRs) were recorded daily for ≤28 days.

resultsThe mean age of the patient (VYC-25L, n = 97; control, n = 51) was 31.2 years (range, 20-52 years). Mean CFB in G-Sn-Pog angle at Week 24 was 2.97° (VYC-25L) vs 0.09° (control; between-group difference, 3.08° [P < .0001]); improvement was maintained to Week 52. At Week 24, VYC-25L achieved higher responses vs control for CACRS (78.7% vs 18.8%, respectively; rate difference, 60.0%; P < .0001) and GAIS (92.6% vs 4.2%, respectively; rate difference, 88.4%; P < .0001); mean overall FACE-Q Satisfaction with Chin score was 70.4 vs 34.9, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) procedural pain was 2.6 (1.6); most ISRs were mild (41.8%) or moderate (50.0%) in severity.

conclusionsIn Chinese adults, VYC-25L safely and effectively corrected chin retrusion for at least 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 (THERAPEUTIC):

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesDermal FillersHyaluronic AcidLidocaineAdultAnesthetics, LocalChinChinaEast Asian PeopleEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProcedural PainAnesthetics, LocalDermal FillersHyaluronic AcidLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID40246546
PMCPMC12168443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.