Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40246387›Full record

ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2025

A Multicenter Study of Contemporary Long-Term Tafamidis Outcomes in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.

Ahmad Masri, Priyanka Bhattacharya, Brent Medoff, Ain U Ejaz, Miriam R Elman, Pranav Chandrashekar, Lauren Ives, Alfonsina Mirabal Santos, Sergio L Teruya, Yuanzi Zhao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Therapy of amyloidosis: stabilizers and silencers.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ahmad MasriAmyloidosis Center, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. Electronic address: Masria@ohsu.edu.
Priyanka BhattacharyaCardiac Amyloidosis Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Brent MedoffUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ain U EjazSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Miriam R ElmanAmyloidosis Center, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Pranav ChandrashekarAmyloidosis Center, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Lauren IvesAmyloidosis Center, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Alfonsina Mirabal SantosCardiac Amyloidosis Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sergio L TeruyaCardiac Amyloidosis Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Yuanzi ZhaoAmyloidosis Center, Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Shuaiqi HuangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Xiaofeng WangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Brett W SperrySaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Mathew S MaurerCardiac Amyloidosis Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Prem SomanUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mazen HannaAmyloidosis Center, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTafamidis improved survival and decreased cardiovascular hospitalizations in the ATTR-ACT trial. Due to improved recognition and earlier diagnosis, the epidemiology of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is rapidly evolving.

objectivesThe authors sought to evaluate the contemporary long-term outcomes of patients with ATTR-CM treated with tafamidis.

methodsPatients with ATTR-CM who received at least 1 dose of tafamidis between 2018 and 2021 at 5 amyloidosis centers in the United States were enrolled. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

resultsAmong 624 patients, mean age was 76.9 ± 8.4 years, 12.5% were female, 17.5% were Black, and 17.5% had variant ATTR-CM. At the time of tafamidis start, 52% had NYHA functional class II, 34% had NYHA functional class III, 40% were in National Amyloidosis Center (NAC) Stage ≥II, 38% were in Columbia Stage ≥II, and the median NT-proBNP level was 1,914 (Q1-Q3: 957-3914) pg/mL. Over a median follow-up of 43.2 months (Q1-Q3: 25.2-52.8 months), 241 patients (38.6%) died. The probability of freedom from death at 65 months was 54.1% (95% CI: 47.4%-60.4%). Similarly, restricting the cohort to patients who received tafamidis within 6 months of their ATTR-CM diagnosis (n = 397, 63.6%) showed similar results, with a survival probability of 49.6% (95% CI: 37.6%-60.5%) at 65 months.

conclusionsIn a contemporary cohort of tafamidis-treated patients with ATTR-CM, 39% of patients died over a median of 43 months. Further work is needed to improve our understanding of ATTR-CM, its natural history, and how to further improve survival and prevent progression of heart failure.

Indexed as

amyloidosisATTR cardiomyopathyepidemiologyoutcomestafamidis

Identifiers

PMID40246387
PMCPMC12046781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.