ReviewJACC. CardioOncology2025
Quality-of-Care Measures for Cardio-Oncology: An IC-OS and ACC Cardio-Oncology Leadership Council Perspective.
Review in JACC. CardioOncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing Oncological Care and Quality of Life: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Long-term mortality and acute complications after percutaneous pericardiocentesis in cancer and noncancer patients presenting with severe pericardial effusion.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Cardiac monitoring in adolescent and young adult cancer patients treated with anthracyclines: a longitudinal descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Performance of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Scores and Objective Optimization in Cancer Survivors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Global disparities and future directions in cardio-oncology training: an international survey of cardiology trainees from the international cardio-oncology society.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Research Priorities and Future Directions in Cardio-Oncology.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Integrated Cardio-oncology Service.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Cardio-oncology in multidisciplinary synergy: addressing the rising burden of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) in advancing oncology practices.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- The effect of different telerehabilitation technologies on the management of cardiovascular disease in oncology survivors: systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Review
- Healthcare Management in Cardio-Oncology, Clinical Strategies and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessment of Early Cardiotoxicity and Cardiac Dysfunction of Radioligand Therapy in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors.Cancers · 2025Article
- Non-invasive mapping of ventricular action potential waveforms reconstructed from clinical unshielded magnetocardiography. Potential diagnostic application and current limitations.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This document serves as a perspective on quality assessments in the discipline of cardio-oncology. We aim to define the current landscape, identify needs for quality and outcome improvements, and propose a roadmap for establishing viable metrics to improve patient care. Specifically, this document: 1) addresses the current lack of measurable high-quality metrics in cardio-oncology and their implications; 2) highlights needs and topic-specific barriers; 3) illustrates the process and application of a measurable quality metric; and 4) provides a framework to demonstrate measurable value for the growing population of patients with cancer and cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.