ArticleJournal of molecular biology2025
scHiCcompare: An R Package for Differential Analysis of Single-cell Hi-C Data.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SHICEDO: single-cell Hi-C data enhancement with reduced over-smoothing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- PB-DiffHiC: a statistical framework for detecting differential chromatin interactions from high resolution pseudo-bulk Hi-C data.BMC genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Changes in the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the human genome are associated with various conditions, such as cancer and developmental disorders. Techniques like chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) have been developed to study these global 3D structures, typically requiring millions of cells and an extremely high sequencing depth (around 1 billion reads per sample) for bulk Hi-C. In contrast, single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C) captures 3D structures at the individual cell level but faces significant data sparsity, characterized by a high proportion of zeros. scHi-C data enable the identification of cell types with distinct 3D structures; consequently, identifying differential chromatin interactions between such groups may offer insights into cell type-specific regulation. While differential analysis methods exist for bulk Hi-C data, they are limited for scHi-C data. To address this, we developed a method for differential scHi-C analysis, extending the HiCcompare R package. Our approach optionally imputes sparse scHi-C data by considering genomic distances and creates pseudo-bulk Hi-C matrices by summing condition-specific data. The data are normalized using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression, and differential chromatin interactions are detected via Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) clustering. Our workflow outperforms existing methods in identifying differential chromatin interactions across various genomic distances, fold changes, resolutions, and sample sizes in both simulated and experimental contexts. This enables the effective detection of cell type-specific differences in chromatin structure and shows expected associations with biological and epigenetic features. Our method is implemented in the scHiCcompare R package, available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/scHiCcompare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.