ArticleJournal of pediatric surgery2025
Adolescent and Parent Perceptions of the American College of Surgeons Safe and Effective Pain Control Brochure.
Article in Journal of pediatric surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe American College of Surgeons Safe and Effective Pain Control After Surgery for Children and Teens brochure highlights the risks of prescription opioid use for adolescents undergoing surgery and outlines safe use, storage, and disposal principles. Understanding how diverse patient populations use this brochure will enable providers to deliver guideline-consistent opioid education. In this study, we solicited feedback about the brochure from adolescents who underwent surgery and their parents.
methodsWe recruited adolescents aged 13-20 years who underwent surgeries commonly associated with opioid prescriptions and their parents from a previous longitudinal survey-based cohort study measuring postoperative opioid use. Recruitment was balanced for race/ethnicity, health literacy, and language preference. We held four virtual focus groups that included English-speaking adolescents, adolescents who spoke Spanish at home, parents who preferred participation in English, and parents who preferred to participation in Spanish (n = 15). Qualitative thematic analysis of the groups' feedback was performed.
resultsParents desired more procedure-specific guidance on administering opioids and more explicit directions about managing medication side effects. Adolescent participants reported that the phrasing of the brochure left them feeling alienated from its content. Both groups noted that the layout was lengthy, lacked representative images, and emphasized addiction and overdose risks to the point of making them question taking opioids at all. Finally, participants expressed learning new information about safe prescription opioid storage and disposal.
conclusionsAdolescents undergoing surgery and their parents want a brief pain control brochure that contains actionable instructions regarding opioid side effects, is adolescent- and family-centered, and optimizes visual information. TYPE OF STUDY: Qualitative Focus Group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.