ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Characterizing trends in clinical genetic testing: A single-center analysis of EHR data from 1.8 million patients over two decades.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in awareness and uptake of genetic testing among the United States population, 2011-2022.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- An EHR-based framework for modeling growth curves and constructing growth centile charts for genetic disorders.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in mothers with genetic disease using electronic health care records.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Drivers of Diagnostic Delay in Mitochondrial Disease: Missed Recognition of Canonical Features.JIMD reports · 2026Article
- Beyond Carrier Status: CFTR Heterozygosity as an Overlooked Clinical Risk Factor for Pancreatitis.Clinical genetics · 2025Article
- Mastering genetics for your clinic: A step-by-step guide.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- Practice-Based Insights into Adult Genetics: High Diagnostic Yield, Demographic Determinants, and Patterns of Test Utilization in Over 7,000 Patients.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Incomplete Family History and Meeting Algorithmic Criteria for Genetic Evaluation of Hereditary Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A lack of structural data in electronic health records (EHRs) makes assessing the impact of genetic testing on clinical practice challenging. We extracted clinical genetic tests from the EHRs of more than 1.8 million patients seen at Vanderbilt University Medical Center from 2002 to 2022. With these data, we quantified the use of clinical genetic testing in healthcare and described how testing patterns and results changed over time. We assessed trends in types of genetic tests, tracked usage across medical specialties, and introduced a new measure, the genetically attributable fraction (GAF), to quantify the proportion of observed phenotypes attributable to a genetic diagnosis over time. We identified 104,392 tests and 19,032 molecularly confirmed diagnoses. The proportion of patients with genetic testing in their EHRs increased from 1.0% in 2002 to 6.1% in 2022, and testing became more comprehensive with the growing use of multi-gene panels. The number of unique diseases diagnosed with genetic testing increased from 51 in 2002 to 509 in 2022, and there was a rise in the number of variants of uncertain significance. The phenome-wide GAF for 6,505,620 diagnoses made in 2022 was 0.46%, and the GAF was greater than 5% for 74 phenotypes, including pancreatic insufficiency (67%), chorea (64%), atrial septal defect (24%), microcephaly (17%), paraganglioma (17%), and ovarian cancer (6.8%). Our study provides a comprehensive quantification of the increasing role of genetic testing at a major academic medical institution and demonstrates its growing utility in explaining the observed medical phenome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.