Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40245536›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Incorporation of probiotics in post-harvest wash treatments reduces Salmonella contamination and improves egg safety.

Ragini Reddyvari, Si Lu, Praveen Kosuri, Mary Anne Amalaradjou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ragini ReddyvariDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Si LuDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Praveen KosuriDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Mary Anne AmalaradjouDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Connecticut, 17, Manter Road, Unit 4040, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. Electronic address: mary_anne.amalaradjou@uconn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) is a prevalent foodborne pathogen that is commonly transmitted through contaminated shell eggs. Therefore, decontamination of eggs is critical to food safety. Hence, this study determined the efficacy of incorporating probiotics in wash water to promote egg safety. Fresh eggs inoculated with a five-strain mix of SE (∼9 log CFU/egg) were washed using either a dip or spray method with one of the following treatments: Lactobacillus rhamnosus NRRL-B-442 (LR; ∼10 log CFU/ml), L. paracasei DUP 13076 (LP; ∼10 log CFU/ml), Hafnia alvei (HA; ∼10 log CFU/ml), chlorine (200 ppm), or tap water (Control). Eggs were sampled for surviving SE and probiotic populations immediately following wash and during refrigerated storage for 21 days. Three independent trials were conducted in a completely randomized design, and data were analyzed using GraphPad (Version 9.3.1) with significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Both dip and spray application of probiotics significantly reduced SE populations on eggshells and within internal contents throughout refrigerated storage (p ≤ 0.05). On the external surface SE populations in LP and LR groups were reduced to ∼4 log CFU/egg and ∼2 log CFU/egg on days 7 and 14 respectively, while ∼5.6 log CFU/egg and ∼4.8 log CFU/egg were still recovered from control and chlorine-treated samples. Similarly, only 10 % of probiotic-treated samples tested positive for SE in internal contents as opposed to 30-40 % positivity in the control and chlorine-treated samples. Overall, probiotic application by spraying or dipping significantly reduced SE populations on eggs (P ≤ 0.05) without impacting egg quality parameters including Haugh units and egg grade (P > 0.05). Although both washing modalities were effective, reduced water usage makes the spray method more environmentally friendly. Overall, incorporation of probiotics in wash water can be a safe, effective, and organic-friendly antimicrobial strategy to promote egg safety.

Indexed as

ChickensEggsFood HandlingFood MicrobiologyFood SafetyProbioticsSalmonella enteritidisSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnimalsLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusLactobacillusOvumEgg qualityEgg safetyProbioticsSalmonella EnteritidisWash water

Identifiers

PMID40245536
PMCPMC12172268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.