Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40245454›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2025

Tell me why: A scoping review on the fundamental building blocks of fMRI-based network analysis.

Z van der Pal, L Douw, A Genis, D van den Bergh, M Marsman, A Schrantee, T F Blanken

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Jointly estimating individual and group networks from fMRI data.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Z van der PalAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: z.vanderpal@amsterdamumc.nl.
L DouwAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A GenisUniversity of Amsterdam, Department of Psychological Methods, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 129B, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D van den BerghUniversity of Amsterdam, Department of Psychological Methods, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 129B, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M MarsmanUniversity of Amsterdam, Department of Psychological Methods, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 129B, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A SchranteeAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
T F BlankenUniversity of Amsterdam, Department of Psychological Methods, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 129B, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding complex brain-behaviour relationships in psychiatric and neurological conditions is crucial for advancing clinical insights. This review explores the current landscape of network estimation methods in the context of functional MRI (fMRI) based network neuroscience, focusing on static undirected network analysis. We focused on papers published in a single year (2022) and characterised what we consider the fundamental building blocks of network analysis: sample size, network size, association type, edge inclusion strategy, edge weights, modelling level, and confounding factors. We found that the most common methods across all included studies (n = 191) were the use of pairwise correlations to estimate the associations between brain regions (79.6 %), estimation of weighted networks (95.3 %), and estimation of the network at the individual level (86.9 %). Importantly, a substantial number of studies lacked comprehensive reporting on their methodological choices, hindering the synthesis of research findings within the field. This review underscores the critical need for careful consideration and transparent reporting of fMRI network estimation methodologies to advance our understanding of complex brain-behaviour relationships. By facilitating the integration between network neuroscience and network psychometrics, we aim to significantly enhance our clinical understanding of these intricate connections.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetHumansConnectomeFunctional connectivityFunctional MRIGraph theoryNetwork neuroscienceStatic undirected networks

Identifiers

PMID40245454
PMCPMC12264222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.