Observational studyJMIR medical informatics2025
Effect of Smartphone-Based Messaging on Interns and Nurses at an Academic Medical Center: Observational Study.
Observational study in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital communication between nurses and medicine interns plays a crucial role in patient care. However, excessive messaging may contribute to alert fatigue, potentially affecting workflow efficiency and clinical decision-making. Although prior research has examined general messaging behaviors among clinicians, few studies have specifically analyzed messaging patterns between nurses and interns, who serve as primary points of contact in inpatient care. objectives: This study aims to quantitatively characterize messaging patterns between the primary nurse and primary provider (ie, medicine intern) of hospitalized patients at an academic medical center in order to identify communication burdens and potential inefficiencies. By identifying trends in message volume, timing, and response rates, we seek to inform strategies to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue. Methods: At a large academic hospital (Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA), we analyzed secure messaging transactions between internal medicine interns and nurses across three medical-surgical units over 6 months. Transaction metadata, time stamps, and unique message tokens were extracted. Data processing was performed using Python, Microsoft Excel, and R. Message volume, interaction frequencies, and response times were analyzed using measures of central tendency and statistical tests of significance. Results: A total of 61,057 unique messages were exchanged between interns and nurses, with interns exchanging 2.5 times more messages per day with nurses than vice versa (P<.001). Messaging volume exhibited diurnal variation, indicating periods of increased communication burden. Interns read messages from nurses within a median of 35 (range: 0-3589) seconds, whereas nurses read messages from interns within a median of 26 (range: 0-3584) seconds (P<.001). The longest message response delays occurred at 4 AM, whereas the shortest occurred at 8 AM. Conclusions: Interns experience a significantly higher messaging burden than nurses, with distinct peaks in message volume during morning rounds and overnight shifts. These findings suggest a need for interventions such as optimized digital communication protocols to reduce nonessential messaging and alert fatigue. Future research should explore the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing workflow efficiency and the development of both in-person and digital interventions to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.