Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40245247›Full record

ArticleNursing open2025

Palliative Care Environments in an Acute Hospital for End-Of-Life Care-Perspectives of Patients, Next of Kin and Healthcare Professionals.

Dorte Buchwald, Cecilie Hübner, Louise Sofia Madsen, Dorte Melgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dorte BuchwaldPalliative Care Team, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2025-8936
Cecilie HübnerDepartment of Surgery, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0006-0906-7297
Louise Sofia MadsenDEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Århus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0919-2454
Dorte MelgaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5656-402X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of patients, next of kin and healthcare professionals on planning a new end-of-life room in a department of surgery in an acute hospital.

designQualitative study.

methodsBetween January and March 2023, 20 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted at the REDACTED. Participants included seven seriously ill and dying patients, three next of a kin and ten health care professionals. The interviews focused on identifying key elements that participants deemed important in an end-of-life room during the final days of life.

findingsData analysis revealed two main themes: 'Lively physical surroundings' and 'Human and medical competencies' of the health care professionals. The findings highlight a shared understanding among participants of the importance of lively physical surroundings, including aesthetics, connections to nature, appropriate lighting and the creation of a homely atmosphere. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Although patients and next of kin were not involved in the planning of the study due to ethical considerations, nurses working on the ward contributed valuable insights during the study's design. Their input helped ensure the relevance and feasibility of the research in a clinical setting. REPORTING

methodCOREQ was used as aguideline.

Indexed as

FamilyHealth PersonnelPalliative CarePatientsTerminal CareAdultAgedFemaleHospitalsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchdesignfamilyhealing architecturepalliationpatient‐/person‐centred care

Identifiers

PMID40245247
PMCPMC12005391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.