ArticlePloS one2025
Effectiveness of theory-based breast self-examination intervention for breast cancer prevention among female college teachers in Pakistan: A cluster randomized controlled trial study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The impact of educational interventions on breast self-examination practice, knowledge, and beliefs among women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of public health research · 2026Review
- Impact of pharmacist-led educational services in promoting breast cancer awareness.BMC women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer poses a significant health challenge in Pakistan, with a disproportionately high number of cases diagnosed at advanced stages. Despite the rising incidence, preventative measures like regular screening remain not commonly practiced among Pakistani women. While extensive research exists on breast cancer globally, there is a critical gap in studies specifically designed and evaluated to enhance breast self-examination practices within the Pakistani context. METHODOLOGY: The primary goal of this study is to design and implement an educational intervention on breast self-examination and evaluate its effectiveness among college teachers in Pakistan. This protocol outlines a single-blind, parallel cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT) with an intervention period of three months. Clusters will be randomly assigned to either the control or intervention groups,and baseline data will be gathered from both groups. An intervention based on the health belief model will be executed for the intervention group to improve women's knowledge and behaviors about breast self-examination (BSE). Data will be collected at two follow-up intervals for both groups post-intervention. The modified questionnaires include constructs such as breast cancer symptoms, risk factors, detection techniques, frequency and practices of breast self-examination, and perceptions of breast cancer. The control group will get the intervention once the trial concludes. The primary outcome of this study is breast self-examination (BSE) practice, whereas secondary outcomes encompass knowledge and beliefs related to breast cancer and BSE. DISCUSSION: This cluster randomized controlled trial is aimed to improve the efficacy and legitimacy of theory-based intervention by increasing women's knowledge of breast self-examination and breast cancer and changing their attitudes to encourage early breast cancer detection by practicing breast self-examination. This might significantly allow an improved detection rate; therefore, earlier treatment can be offered. Therefore, lower the death rate from breast cancer and guide health promotion initiatives in other comparable settings. Furthermore, less aggressive therapies are frequently possible with early detection, which enhances healthcare cost-effectiveness while also improving patient outcomes and treatment burdens.
trial registrationThis study protocol is registered with the Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR), TCTR20240703005 (https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20240703005). The following study protocol complied with the Standard Protocol Items Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklist. (S1 file).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.