ArticlePloS one2025
Oral anticoagulant use among Medicare patients newly diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE): Factors associated with treatment status.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient Satisfaction with Anticoagulation for Venous Thromboembolic Disease: A Systematic Review of Oral and Parenteral Regiments.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to describe oral anticoagulant (OAC) use among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (data from 1/1/2014-12/31/2019) newly diagnosed with VTE. Factors associated with being untreated with OACs in the first month from VTE (vs. OAC-treated), with receiving direct-acting OACs ([DOACs] vs. warfarin), and with extended OAC treatment (>3 months) were assessed using multivariable logistic regressions.
resultsOverall, 169,928 patients with VTE (50.3% OAC-untreated) were included. Among the 49.7% OAC-treated patients, 74.0% used DOACs and 62.5% had extended OAC treatment. Factors associated with being untreated with OACs in the first month from VTE (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval) included Hispanic ethnicity (vs. White;1.35; 1.29-1.42), having part D low-income subsidy (1.14; 1.07, 1.20), and comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases. Among the OAC-treated cohort, patients with index VTE diagnosis in the emergency room (vs. outpatient) setting had higher odds of receiving DOAC vs. warfarin; patients with pulmonary embolism diagnosis (vs. deep vein thrombosis) had higher odds of extended OAC treatment.
conclusionsIn this study of Medicare patients newly diagnosed with VTE, half of the patients were not treated with OAC in the first month from initial diagnosis. Factors such as Hispanic ethnicity, having low-income subsidy, and comorbidity burden were found to be associated with being untreated with OAC. Among OAC-treated patients, the majority were treated with DOAC vs. warfarin. Interestingly, more than a third of OAC-treated patients were not treated beyond 3 months, which warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.