ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Mammary gland multi-omics data reveals new genetic insights into milk production traits in dairy cattle.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Histone Modifications: Decoding the Epigenetic Basis of Economic Traits in Livestock and Poultry.Genes · 2026Review
- Global analysis of bovine milk protein variants using multi-breed DNA sequence data.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Selection Signature Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequences to Identify Genome Differences Between Selected and Unselected Holstein Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although many sequence variants have been discovered in cattle, deciphering the relationship between genome and phenome remains a significant challenge. In this study, we identified functional classes, including mammary-specific genes, lactation-associated genes, novel long non-coding RNAs, miRNAs, RNA editing sites, DNA methylation, histone modifications, and expression quantitative trait loci. We estimated their contributions to genetic variance for milk production traits using 3 million variants in 23,566 Holstein bulls. Sequence variants in the 5'-UTR, synonymous, and splicing regions disproportionately contributed to genetic variance of milk production traits compared to other genomic regions. Genes specifically expressed in the mammary gland, particularly those active in lactating tissue (e.g., GLYCAM1, DGAT1), account for significantly more genetic variance of milk production traits than specific genes from non-mammary tissues. We identified 8,560 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between lactating and non-lactating tissues. Among these, both up-regulated and small-fold changes of down-regulated DEGs exhibited greater genetic variance enrichment of milk production traits than other genes. Mammary enhancers (e.g., H3K27ac, H3K4Me1) explained more variance than repressive elements, while small changes in DNA methylation level (≤0.2) contributed more variance than that with larger changes (> 0.2). Notably, lactation-associated RNA editing sites in mammary explained more variance for milk production traits than expected by chance. We proposed a novel miRNA prioritization strategy for selecting candidate miRNAs related to milk production traits, based on the overlaps between significant enrichment tests of miRNA target correlations and the relatively large variance explained by these targets. Additionally, we integrated these nine functional classes into the variance component analysis simultaneously, revealing that sQTLs, histone modification and DEGs showed the highest per-SNP variance enrichment. Finally, we constructed a new 624K SNP panel, which improved the reliabilities of genomic predictions by 0.22%. Dividing routine SNPs into two groups based on functional classes improved the reliabilities by 0.21%, particularly for milk protein percentage (0.68% improvement). Overall, incorporating prior biological knowledge of the mammary gland directly enhances our understanding of milk production's genetic architecture and improves the reliability of genomic predictions for milk production traits. This integrative approach establishes a paradigm for translating biological knowledge into agricultural genomics applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.