ArticlePloS one2025
Should I stay or should I go-Medical assistants´ experiences and coping with patient demand and lack of appreciation during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis article explores the psychological burden experienced by medical assistants (MAs) in General Practices during the Covid-19 pandemic (Corona virus disease 2019 (SARS-CoV-2)) in Germany. The study aims on demanding patient behavior, increased workload, and the perceived lack of appreciation and discuss their potential impact on the MAs´ well-being and career decisions.
methodsA qualitative approach was utilized. MAs were included via a regional practice network as well as professional associations and newsletters. In total, 21 interviews with MAs from various federal states in Germany were conducted between April and September 2021. The semi-structured interview guideline focused on daily work challenges during the pandemic and its consequences. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.
resultsThe findings highlight core challenges, including demanding communication with patients, lack of appreciation in the media, a high workload, resilience versus career migration, and the needs and wishes of MAs in their everyday work. Abusive language, insults, and theft of materials by patients added significant stress. The interviews reveal how important teamwork and a supportive working environment are for overcoming these challenges.
conclusionsThe study underlines the urgent need for societal and political awareness regarding the challenges faced by MAs, especially during public health crises. The perceived social egoism in patient behavior, coupled with a lack of recognition and appreciation, contributed to a challenging work atmosphere and potential burnout risk. Recommendations include enhancing support for MAs, recognizing their contributions in the media, and fostering collaborative efforts between practitioners and policymakers to address the unique challenges in general practices.
trial registrationGerman Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS) DRKS00032402; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00032402 (Registration Date: 14.08.2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.