Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244975›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Modeling diffusive search by non-adaptive sperm: Empirical and computational insights.

Benjamin M Brisard, Kylie D Cashwell, Stephanie M Stewart, Logan M Harrison, Aidan C Charles, Chelsea V Dennis, Ivie R Henslee, Ethan L Carrow, Heather A Belcher, Debajit Bhowmick and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Benjamin M BrisardDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Kylie D CashwellDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Stephanie M StewartDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Logan M HarrisonDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Aidan C CharlesDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Chelsea V DennisDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ivie R HensleeDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ethan L CarrowDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Heather A BelcherDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, North Carolina, United States of America.
Debajit BhowmickFlow Cytometry Core Facility, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4905-569X
Paul W VosDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Maciej MajkaInstitute of Theoretical Physics and Mark Kac Center for Complex Systems Research, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-3017
Martin BierDepartment of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
David M HartDepartment of Computer Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Cameron A SchmidtDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6628-6329

Funding

Selecting sperm with distinct metabolic phenotypes to increase ART efficiencyR01HD110170 · NICHD · EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher Bennett Geyer · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD110170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During fertilization, mammalian sperm undergo a winnowing selection process that reduces the candidate pool of potential fertilizers from ~106-1011 cells to 101-102 cells (depending on the species). Classical sperm competition theory addresses the positive or 'stabilizing' selection acting on sperm phenotypes within populations of organisms but does not strictly address the developmental consequences of sperm traits among individual organisms that are under purifying selection during fertilization. It is the latter that is of utmost concern for improving assisted reproductive technologies (ART) because low-fitness sperm may be inadvertently used for fertilization during interventions that rely heavily on artificial sperm selection, such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Importantly, some form of sperm selection is used in nearly all forms of ART (e.g., differential centrifugation, swim-up, or hyaluronan binding assays, etc.). To date, there is no unifying quantitative framework (i.e., theory of sperm selection) that synthesizes causal mechanisms of selection with observed natural variation in individual sperm traits. In this report, we reframe the physiological function of sperm as a collective diffusive search process and develop multi-scale computational models to explore the causal dynamics that constrain sperm fitness during fertilization. Several experimentally useful concepts are developed, including a probabilistic measure of sperm fitness as well as an information theoretic measure of the magnitude of sperm selection, each of which are assessed under systematic increases in microenvironmental selective pressure acting on sperm motility patterns.

Indexed as

FertilizationModels, BiologicalSpermatozoaAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleSperm Motility

Identifiers

PMID40244975
PMCPMC12005489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.