ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025
Straining Flow Effects on Sperm Flagellar Energetics in Microfluidic Cross-Slot Traps.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrospun poly(lactic acid) biopolymer fibers functionalized with Y-sperm-specific scFv enable immunoaffinity-driven bovine sperm sexing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Straining Flow Effects on Sperm Flagellar Energetics in Microfluidic Cross-Slot Traps.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sperm need to effectively navigate the intricate pathways of the female reproductive tract, which are filled with various complex fluid flows. Despite numerous population-based studies, the effects of flow on the flagellar beating pattern of individual sperm remain poorly understood. In this study, a microfluidic cross-slot trap is employed to immobilize individual motile sperm for an extended period without physical tethering, thereby reducing potential cell damage and movement restriction compared to the conventional head-tethering method. The impact of pure straining flow on trapped single sperm is investigated. The experimental results demonstrate that at strain rates of 11.33 s
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.