ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Baseline and changes in inflammatory parameters for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with afatinib.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Baseline and changes in inflammatory parameters for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with afatinib.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers (lymphocyte ratio [NLR], monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio [MLR], and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR]) and the treatment outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with afatinib.
methodsThe patients with NSCLC treated with afatinib between June 2014 and February 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Their inflammatory biomarkers and clinical outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and tumor response) were explored using univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsAmong 325 patients, those with an NLR >2.18, MLR >0.19, and PLR >177.73 had significantly worse PFS than those with lower values. After adjusting for performance status, stage, and liver metastasis, the PFS was still unfavorable for a baseline NLR >2.18, MLR >0.19, or PLR > 177.73. Among 188 patients with paired inflammatory values, those whose NLR decreased by >29.5%, MLR decreased by >57.9%, and PLR increased by <18.8% had significantly better PFS. After adjusting for performance status, stage, and liver metastasis, the PFS was significantly unfavorable for an NLR decrease of <29.5% and MLR decrease of <57.9%. Among the patients with tumor response, NLR, MLR, and PLR significantly decreased after treatment (all p < 0.05).
conclusionsOur study presented the NLR, MLR, and PLR as prognostic factors for patients with NSCLC treated with afatinib. Further investigation into these markers representing the tumor microenvironment and their association with cancer status is crucial for evaluating prognosis and clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.