ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2025
Cortical Excitability Before and After Long-Term Perampanel Treatment for Epilepsy.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAntiseizure medications (ASMs), which may influence cortical excitability, are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) helps evaluate cortical excitability. We assessed changes in TMS responses using serial TMS measurements in people treated with an adjunctive noncompetitive AMPA-receptor antagonist.
methodsWe included adults with refractory, active epilepsy (≥ 1 seizure/month), advised to start adjunctive treatment with the noncompetitive AMPA-receptor antagonist perampanel as outpatients. After informed consent, we performed TMS measurement at three points: baseline before starting perampanel, at around 2 months after starting (4 mg/day), and at a final/effective dose around 6 months. Dependent on seizure reduction (> 50%), participants were dichotomized into responders (Rs) and nonresponders (NRs). We compared changes in motor cortex excitability through the rMT using a linear mixed-effects model. We evaluated TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) to single pulse and paired pulse using within-subject Monte Carlo-based permutation analysis.
resultsWe included 18 adults, of whom 17 (6 R, 11 NR, 1 lost to follow-up) had baseline and second-month measurements, and nine (4 R, 5 NR) had all three. In responders, motor cortex excitability, quantified by rMT, significantly increased with increasing dose. Conversely, no significant changes were seen in the NR subgroup. TEPs for the single pulse and paired pulse showed no significant clusters for any peaks between measurement and group comparisons.
interpretationThe TEPs showed no significant changes between measurements and/or groups. Motor cortex excitability quantified by rMT is a potential biomarker to track or predict treatment outcomes in people starting adjunctive perampanel for epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.