Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244650›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

A general framework for characterizing optimal communication in brain networks.

Kayson Fakhar, Fatemeh Hadaeghi, Caio Seguin, Shrey Dixit, Arnaud Messé, Gorka Zamora-López, Bratislav Misic, Claus C Hilgetag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kayson FakharMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0615-1777
Fatemeh HadaeghiInstitute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Eppendorf-Hamburg, Hamburg University, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, Hamburg, Germany.
Caio SeguinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.
Shrey DixitInstitute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Eppendorf-Hamburg, Hamburg University, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, Hamburg, Germany.
Arnaud MesséInstitute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Eppendorf-Hamburg, Hamburg University, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9081-3088
Gorka Zamora-LópezCenter for Brain and Cognition, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
Bratislav MisicMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-2862
Claus C HilgetagInstitute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Eppendorf-Hamburg, Hamburg University, Hamburg Center of Neuroscience, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Brain Canada Future Leaders FundDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1461Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 936-178316478Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP 2041/GO 2888/2-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SPP 2041/HI 1286/7-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TRR169Human Brain Project EU (SGA2)Human Brain Project EU(SGA3)Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant RGPIN #017-04265TWCF 10.54224/30510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient communication in brain networks is foundational for cognitive function and behavior. However, how communication efficiency is defined depends on the assumed model of signaling dynamics, e.g., shortest path signaling, random walker navigation, broadcasting, and diffusive processes. Thus, a general and model-agnostic framework for characterizing optimal neural communication is needed. We address this challenge by assigning communication efficiency through a virtual multi-site lesioning regime combined with game theory, applied to large-scale models of human brain dynamics. Our framework quantifies the exact influence each node exerts over every other, generating optimal influence maps given the underlying model of neural dynamics. These descriptions reveal how communication patterns unfold if regions are set to maximize their influence over one another. Comparing these maps with a variety of brain communication models showed that optimal communication closely resembles a broadcasting regime in which regions leverage multiple parallel channels for information dissemination. Moreover, we found that the brain's most influential regions are its rich-club, exploiting their topological vantage point by broadcasting across numerous pathways that enhance their reach even if the underlying connections are weak. Altogether, our work provides a rigorous and versatile framework for characterizing optimal brain communication, and uncovers the most influential brain regions, and the topological features underlying their influence.

Indexed as

BrainCommunicationModels, NeurologicalNerve NetGame TheoryHumansbrain networkscommunicationcommunication efficiencyhumanmousenetwork dynamicsneurosciencepropagationrhesus macaque

Identifiers

PMID40244650
PMCPMC12005722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.