ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Application of Metagenomic Long-Read Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Herpetic Uveitis.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Infectious Uveitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.Viruses · 2025Pooled it
- Amplification-Free Nanopore Sequencing for Herpesvirus DNA Detection in Intraocular Fluids.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Levels of Zinc, Iron, and Copper in the Aqueous Humor of Patients with Primary Glaucoma.Biomolecules · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of herpes virus detection by nanopore metagenomic analysis (NMA) compared with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR)-positive and -negative controls. Methods: This study included 43 patients with uveitis who had been screened for intraocular herpes virus infection using mPCR from aqueous humor samples. Aqueous humor samples stored after mPCR were subjected to whole-genome amplification, long-read sequencing, and analysis of the phylogenetic microorganism composition using a Flongle flow cell on the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. For samples that tested positive with mPCR and negative with the Flongle flow cell, additional long-read sequencing was performed using a MinION flow cell, which enabled acquisition of more sequence data. The sensitivity and specificity of herpes virus detection by NMA were compared with the mPCR-positive and -negative controls. Results: NMA using a Flongle flow cell detected the pathogenic virus in 60.0% of those who tested positive by mPCR (12/20). Further analysis using the MinION flow cell successfully identified viral DNA fragments in three out of the eight initially undetected samples, yielding a collective sensitivity of 75.0% (15/20). All of the virus detected with the long-read sequencing were identical to those diagnosed by mPCR testing, and none of the samples that tested negative by mPCR revealed herpes viral DNA with the use of long-read sequencing. Conclusions: For the detection of etiologic herpes virus DNA fragments, NMA revealed a reasonable sensitivity and high specificity. Our study highlights the potential of nanopore sequencing to facilitate further advances in uveitis diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.