Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244579›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2025

Peripheral Iridectomy With Goniosynechialysis and Goniotomy vs Trabeculectomy for Advanced PACG: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fengbin Lin, Aiguo Lv, Fei Li, Yunhe Song, Lin Xie, Xiaomin Zhu, Li Tang, Yao Zhang, Jingjing Huang, Guangxian Tang and 28 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05163951 (Effectiveness and Safety of Trabeculectomy and Peripheral Iridectomy Plus Goniotomy in Advanced Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05163951 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness and Safety of Trabeculectomy and Peripheral Iridectomy Plus Goniotomy in Advanced Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma: a Multicenter Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled88ConditionsPrimary Angle Closure GlaucomaArmsTrabeculectomy, SPI+GSL+GT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors.

Fengbin LinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Aiguo LvHandan City Eye Hospital (The Third Hospital of Handan), Handan, China.
Fei LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yunhe SongState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Lin XieDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaomin ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li TangDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yao ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jingjing HuangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Guangxian TangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hengli ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Lan LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Meichun XiaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jiangang XuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Xin NieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chongqing People's Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Mengfei LiaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chongqing People's Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Yangfan YangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Kai GaoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Huiping YuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Wulian SongDepartment of Ophthalmology, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Chengguo ZuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Ping LuHandan City Eye Hospital (The Third Hospital of Handan), Handan, China.
Xiaowei YanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China.
Fengqi ZhouMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota.
Zhenyu WangDermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ling JinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yuying PengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Weirong ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Keith BartonNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Ki Ho ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tin AungSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Dennis S C LamThe International Eye Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China.
Robert N WeinrebHamilton Glaucoma Center, Shiley Eye Institute, Viterbi Family Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Ningli WangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Clement C ThamDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Sujie FanHandan City Eye Hospital (The Third Hospital of Handan), Handan, China.
Xiulan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
TVG study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The safety and effectiveness of combining surgical peripheral iridectomy (SPI) with goniosynechialysis (GSL) and goniotomy (GT) vs trabeculectomy for intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness at 1 year of SPI + GSL + GT vs trabeculectomy in advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) without cataract. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 tertiary eye centers in China. A total of 88 Chinese patients (88 eyes) with advanced PACG without cataract were enrolled from January 2022 to July 2023. Data were analyzed from August 2024 to September 2024. Mean (SD) patient age was 60.3 (7.3) years, and 52 patients (59.1%) were female. Forty-three patients were randomized to SPI + GSL + GT and 45 were randomized to trabeculectomy; 86 patients (97.7%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive SPI + GSL + GT or trabeculectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was IOP at 12 months (noninferior margin: 4 mm Hg). Secondary outcomes included surgical success (IOP: 5-18 mm Hg, ≥20% reduction from baseline, with or without antiglaucoma medications); postoperative complications and interventions, including bleb massage, suture lysis, or releasable sutures; and number of antiglaucomatous medications prescribed. Results: At 12 months, the SPI + GSL + GT group had a mean (SD) IOP of 15.6 (4.0) mm Hg vs 14.9 (4.2) mm Hg in the trabeculectomy group (difference, 0.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.2 to 2.2; P = .55), which was within the 4-mm Hg noninferiority margin. Qualified success rates were 38 of 43 participants (88.4%) for SPI + GSL + GT and 42 of 45 participants (93.3%) for trabeculectomy (difference, -5.0%; 95% CI, -19.6% to 8.5%; P = .48). However, complete success rates were lower in the SPI + GSL + GT group (26 participants [60.5%]) vs the trabeculectomy group (37 participants [82.2%]; difference, -21.8%; 95% CI, -40.2% to -2.4%; P = .03). Postoperative complications were present for 8 participants (18.6%) in the SPI + GSL + GT group vs 9 participants (20.0%) in the trabeculectomy group (difference, -1.4%; 95% CI, -17.9% to 15.1%; P = .71). Postoperative interventions were lower in the SPI + GSL + GT group (3 participants [7.0%] vs 25 participants [55.6%]; difference, 48.6%; 95% CI, 32.2%-65.0%; P < .001). Median (IQR) numbers of medications used decreased from 2 (0-3) to 0 (0-1) in the SPI + GSL + GT group and from 2 (2-3) to 0 (0-0) in the trabeculectomy group (difference, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.36 to -0.26; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial among patients with advanced PACG without cataract, SPI + GSL + GT demonstrated noninferiority (4-mm Hg margin) to trabeculectomy for IOP at 12 months, with fewer interventions (including bleb massage, suture lysis, or releasable sutures) but no difference in postoperative medication use. This suggests SPI + GSL + GT as a potential alternative to trabeculectomy for similar cases, pending validation in larger sample sizes with smaller noninferiority margins. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05163951.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Angle-ClosureIntraocular PressureIridectomyIrisTrabeculectomyAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGonioscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedTonometry, OcularTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID40244579
PMCPMC12181785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.