Observational studyTranslational vision science & technology2025
A Tear-Based Approach for Rapid Identification of Bacterial Pathogens in Corneal Ulcers Using Nanopore Sequencing.
Observational study in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amplification-Free Nanopore Sequencing for Herpesvirus DNA Detection in Intraocular Fluids.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Current status and prospects of nanopore sequencing technology in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This prospective observational study assesses the efficacy of using portable next-generation sequencing directly on tear samples to identify bacterial pathogens in corneal ulcers. Methods: Tear samples were collected from ulcerated and contralateral eyes using Schirmer strips. Corneal scrapings and cultures were performed as medically indicated. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified from tear samples using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and Nanopore sequencing was used for bacterial species identification and taxonomic classification. Results: Bacterial DNA was identified in 8 of 10 samples using the tear-based sequencing method. Nanopore sequencing accurately identified the causative bacteria in all four samples that exhibited bacterial growth on culture and detected bacterial pathogens in two of the four ulcers that did not show bacterial growth on culture. In two cases where cultures could not be obtained due to the ulcer's small size, tear sequencing successfully identified bacterial species. Among the nine contralateral tear samples collected, Nanopore sequencing identified commensal bacteria in four samples. Conclusions: PCR amplification of 16S rRNA directly from tears followed by Nanopore sequencing is an effective, noninvasive method to identify bacterial pathogens in corneal ulcers, offering noninferior results to traditional culture methods. Translational Relevance: By eliminating the need for corneal scrapings and nucleic acid extraction, this tear-based method improves the timing and accuracy of bacterial pathogen diagnosis in corneal ulcers, allowing for prompt detection of causative organisms and enabling earlier targeted antimicrobial therapy, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.