Observational studyInternational journal of implant dentistry2025
Retention forces in mini-dental-implant retained mandibular overdentures: 10-year outcomes of a non-comparative longitudinal observational study.
Observational study in International journal of implant dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the evaluation of in vivo retention forces after replacement of O-rings in one-piece mini dental implants (MDIs), retaining mandibular implant overdentures (IODs) with ball/O-ring attachments during 10 years assessed.
methodsTwenty patients received new complete dentures, which were converted into IODs through stabilization with four MDIs (Condent GmbH; diameter: 1.8 mm) placed in the interforaminal region. Retention forces were measured at the male and female parts at baseline, 5, and 10 years using a validated strain gauge. Fourteen patients completed the 10-year follow-up.
resultsAfter 10 years, a minor but significant reduction in retention force was observed in the male part of the implant at position 44. In contrast, neither the male part at the other implant positions nor the female part at any position showed a significant decrease in retention force compared to baseline. After replacement of the O-ring inserts, baseline values could be restored and no significant changes in retention forces were observed at the 10-year follow-up. No difference in anterior and posterior implants could be determined.
conclusionsInitial retention forces of mandibular IODs supported by four MDIs can be reestablished by replacing the O-rings with pristine ones after 10 years, with stable retention forces at both the male and female parts throughout the functional period, with no discernible differences between anterior and posterior implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.