ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Combined peritumoral radiomics and clinical features predict 12-month progression free survival in glioblastoma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A two-stage model combining clinical and delta-radiomics features for prognosis in high-grade gliomas after chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Pre-Radiotherapy Synthetic MRI-Derived Quantitative Heterogeneity and Early Recurrence in Glioblastoma.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Observational
- Radiomics for risk stratification in brain metastases: potential in melanoma brain metastases.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026Article
- Radiomics features from the peritumoral region can be associated with the epilepsy status of glioblastoma patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnalyzing post-treatment MRIs from glioblastoma patients can be challenging due to similar radiological presentations of disease progression and treatment effects. Identifying radiomics features (RFs) revealing progressive glioblastoma can contribute to an improved evaluation of the response assessment.
methods3 Tesla MRI data from 560 glioblastoma patients (mean age 58.1 years) after treatment according to Stupp's protocol were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 418 RFs were extracted from contrast-enhancing tumors, non-enhancing lesions, peritumoral regions (PeriCET) and normal-appearing white matter as regions of interest using PyRadiomics. Dataset was initially split into a training (70%) and a validation (30%) cohort. The training cohort was used for feature selection and model-optimization. Logistic regression was used as a machine-learning model to identify patients with progression-free survival (PFS) as defined by the RANO criteria at 6 and 12 months after treatment. Models were trained with (i) clinical features only, (ii) RFs only, and (iii) a combination of clinical and radiomics features. The performance of each model was evaluated with the validation cohort.
resultsThe predictive performances of the model trained with only RFs from the PeriCET were AUC = 0.61 (95%-CI: 0.51-0.70) and AUC = 0.71 (95%-CI: 0.61-0.81) for 6-months and 12-months PFS respectively. Combining clinical and RFs from PeriCET resulted in overall best performance in predicting patients with progression within 12-months AUC = 0.75 (95%-CI: 0.65-0.85).
conclusionRFs from peritumoral region combined with clinical features including age, sex, and MGMT status can identify patients with 12-months PFS, suggesting the important role of peritumoral regions for the progression of glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40244521What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.