Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244517›Full record

ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2025

Phototherapy of granuloma annulare: a single center retrospective study.

Ines Katharina Himmelstoss, Franz Josef Legat, Alexandra Gruber-Wackernagel, Peter Wolf, Angelika Hofer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ines Katharina HimmelstossMedical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 8, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Franz Josef LegatDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Alexandra Gruber-WackernagelDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Peter WolfDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Angelika HoferDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. angelika.hofer@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9198-2051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGranuloma annulare is a chronic, benign skin condition characterized by small erythematous patches, plaques or papules in annular or disseminated order. Due to the cosmetic impact, many patients experience a significant level of distress. Nevertheless, selecting the optimal treatment method often poses a challenge due to the limited available data. A remission of skin lesions can be achieved through topical, systemic, or intralesional therapies, and various forms of phototherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study included 58 patients diagnosed with granuloma annulare and evaluated a total of 73 cycles of phototherapy (UVA-1, oral-PUVA, bath-PUVA) concerning treatment response and adverse events. It was conducted at the outpatient phototherapy clinic of the University Department for Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz. The Data was collected over the period from February 2011 and February 2021.

resultsComplete response was achieved in 37.5% of the 16 bath-PUVA therapy cycles, 25.7% of the 35 oral-PUVA therapy cycles, and 35.3% of the 17 UVA-1 therapy cycles. Partial response was noted in 62.5% of the oral-PUVA therapies, 50% of the bath-PUVA therapies, and 41.2% of the UVA-1 therapies. Generally, the adverse events of phototherapy were mild, with the highest incidence of adverse events associated with oral-PUVA and the lowest with UVA-1 therapy.

conclusionsNo significant differences in efficacy were found between UVA-1 therapy, oral-PUVA, and bath-PUVA. However, UVA-1 therapy resulted in the fewest adverse events. Given the frequent occurrence of recurrences, the risk-benefit profile of each therapy should be carefully assessed in advance.

Indexed as

Granuloma AnnularePhototherapyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPUVA TherapyRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult311 nmBath-PUVAGranuloma annulareNB-UVBOral-PUVAPhototherapyUVA-1

Identifiers

PMID40244517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.