ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2025
Phototherapy of granuloma annulare: a single center retrospective study.
Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGranuloma annulare is a chronic, benign skin condition characterized by small erythematous patches, plaques or papules in annular or disseminated order. Due to the cosmetic impact, many patients experience a significant level of distress. Nevertheless, selecting the optimal treatment method often poses a challenge due to the limited available data. A remission of skin lesions can be achieved through topical, systemic, or intralesional therapies, and various forms of phototherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study included 58 patients diagnosed with granuloma annulare and evaluated a total of 73 cycles of phototherapy (UVA-1, oral-PUVA, bath-PUVA) concerning treatment response and adverse events. It was conducted at the outpatient phototherapy clinic of the University Department for Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz. The Data was collected over the period from February 2011 and February 2021.
resultsComplete response was achieved in 37.5% of the 16 bath-PUVA therapy cycles, 25.7% of the 35 oral-PUVA therapy cycles, and 35.3% of the 17 UVA-1 therapy cycles. Partial response was noted in 62.5% of the oral-PUVA therapies, 50% of the bath-PUVA therapies, and 41.2% of the UVA-1 therapies. Generally, the adverse events of phototherapy were mild, with the highest incidence of adverse events associated with oral-PUVA and the lowest with UVA-1 therapy.
conclusionsNo significant differences in efficacy were found between UVA-1 therapy, oral-PUVA, and bath-PUVA. However, UVA-1 therapy resulted in the fewest adverse events. Given the frequent occurrence of recurrences, the risk-benefit profile of each therapy should be carefully assessed in advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40244517What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.