Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244512›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2025

Predicting Powder Blend Flowability from Individual Constituent Properties Using Machine Learning.

Anna Owasit, Siddharth Tripathi, Rajesh Davé, Joshua Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna OwasitOtto H. York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 138 Warren St, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Siddharth TripathiOtto H. York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 138 Warren St, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Rajesh DavéOtto H. York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 138 Warren St, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Joshua YoungOtto H. York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 138 Warren St, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA. jyoung@njit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-751X

Funding

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program 137National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program 209National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program IIP- 2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePredicting powder blend flowability is necessary for pharmaceutical manufacturing but challenging and resource-intensive. The purpose was to develop machine learning (ML) models to help predict flowability across multiple flow categories, identify key predictive features, and arrive at formulations with improved flow properties.

methodsA dataset of 410 blends, composed of 9 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and 18 excipients with varying silica dry-coating parameters, was analyzed. Supervised ML models were trained to predict various flowability categories (very cohesive, cohesive, semi-cohesive, well-flowing, and free-flowing). Particle size, morphology, surface properties, and coating parameters were used as features. Classification algorithms, including Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were evaluated. Unsupervised clustering identified natural groupings within flowability data.

resultsThe best-performing models achieved up to 85% accuracy for predicting flowability regimes of individual components and 87% for blends. Individual components generally showed higher accuracy than blends, except in the uncoated scenario with 2 flow regimes, where blends outperformed with 94.67%. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Feature Importance analysis indicated dry coating parameters as the most influential factors, followed by particle size and morphology. ML models effectively identified category transitions between flow regimes, offering insights into blend optimization.

conclusionIntegrating ML with mechanistic approaches effectively predicted powder blend flowability across diverse categories and elucidated feature-property relationships. These outcomes can facilitate the rational design of blends having enhanced flow properties at reduced experimental effort through judiciously selected dry coating of a blend constituent; making this approach promising for advancing pharmaceutical process and product development.

Indexed as

Drug CompoundingExcipientsMachine LearningAlgorithmsChemistry, PharmaceuticalParticle SizePharmaceutical PreparationsPowdersSilicon DioxideSurface PropertiesExcipientsPharmaceutical PreparationsPowdersSilicon DioxideDry coatingFlowabilityMachine learning (ML)Pharmaceutical powder blendsPowder flow prediction

Identifiers

PMID40244512
PMCPMC12055667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.