ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2025
Clinical use of the VNtyper-Kestrel pipeline for MUC1 variant detection in autosomal-dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutosomal-dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease caused by MUC1 (ADTKD-MUC1) is a rare disorder characterized by progressive kidney dysfunction. Pathogenic variants in MUC1 are difficult to detect owing to the variable number tandem repeat region. To address this issue, VNtyper-Kestrel, a bioinformatics pipeline for short-read sequencing data, was recently developed. In this study, the performance of VNtyper-Kestrel for detecting MUC1 variants in clinical settings was evaluated.
methodsWe used VNtyper-Kestrel to retrospectively analyze short-read sequencing data for 209 individuals with suspected ADTKD who were previously evaluated through long-read sequencing. Data from a panel including ~ 180 genes and an ADTKD-specific panel were used. In addition, the pipeline was applied to 976 patients with suspected hereditary kidney diseases other than ADTKD and positive cases were validated using long-read sequencing. Accuracy was assessed by comparisons with the results of long-read sequencing.
resultsUsing VNtyper-Kestrel, we identified MUC1 variants in 16 of 19 confirmed cases of ADTKD-MUC1. Three initially negative cases were reanalyzed using the ADTKD-specific panel, yielding positive detection results with high confidence. We obtained two low-confidence positive results from 190 cases of suspected ADTKD and 10 low-confidence positive results among 976 non-ADTKD cases; however, all were classified as false positives upon long-read sequencing validation.
conclusionsVNtyper-Kestrel demonstrated high sensitivity in identifying MUC1 variants when sequencing coverage was adequate, supporting its potential as a rapid and cost-effective screening tool. However, confirmatory long-read sequencing is needed in uncertain cases. Optimizing coverage and refining patient selection criteria could improve the clinical utility of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.