SynthesisAnnals of hematology2025
Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria in pregnancy-a systematic review with meta analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Ravulizumab for treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria during pregnancy.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Beyond Terminal Blockade: A Mechanism-Based Approach to Complement Inhibitor Selection in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Higher Doses of Eculizumab may be Beneficial in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haemoglobinuria in Pregnancy.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The co-occurrence of Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) and pregnancy has traditionally been associated with poor feto-maternal outcomes. Eculizumab, a terminal complement inhibitor, is often used in pregnant patients, but the drug is not universally available. We therefore present the first systematic review with meta-analysis of outcomes in 190 pregnancies from 135 PNH patients, comparing those receiving eculizumab and those not. We searched PubMed for studies reporting on pregnancy outcomes in PNH. Thirty-five papers were selected for inclusion, the majority of which were case studies or small series. Eculizumab was used in 131 pregnancies. There was one maternal death reported in a woman who did not receive eculizumab. A higher rate of fetal survival was observed in pregnancies where eculizumab was used (82%) than those when it was not (69%). Miscarriage (< 24 weeks gestation) occurred twice as often in women not receiving eculizumab. Intrauterine death (≥24 weeks gestation), maternal thrombosis, bleeding (both antepartum and postpartum), and pre-eclampsia were over-represented in PNH pregnancies but did not significantly differ between treatment groups. Premature birth (< 37 weeks' gestation) was observed in 32% of eculizumab pregnancies and 44% of non-eculizumab pregnancies. We conclude that Eculizumab appears to be safe and benefits pregnant women with PNH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.