ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Quality of life, sleep, and psychological well-being in chronic spontaneous urticaria patients receiving omalizumab: a case-control study.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Family quality-of-life burden in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A multicentre study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026Article
- Association Between Proinflammatory Cytokines IL-6 and TNF-Alpha, Psychological Stress and Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Severity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) impacts both physical and mental well-being, causing distress and sleep disturbances. While omalizumab reduces disease activity, its effects on mental health and quality of life remain unclear. This study assesses the psychosocial burden and sleep disturbances in CSU patients receiving omalizumab compared to healthy controls and explores their relationship with disease parameters. This case--control study included 210 CSU patients receiving omalizumab for at least three months and 210 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Disease severity was assessed using the Urticaria Activity Score over 7 Days (UAS7) and Urticaria Control Test (UCT), while quality of life was evaluated with the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q₂oL). Psychological distress and sleep disturbances were measured using validated scales, including the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). CSU patients had significantly higher scores for perceived stress, depression, anxiety, and daytime sleepiness compared to controls (p < 0.001). Patients with a good response to omalizumab also showed significantly higher psychological distress and poorer sleep quality than controls (p < 0.001). Omalizumab response was good in 29.5%, moderate in 38.6%, and limited in 31.9% of patients. Despite treatment, 32.9% reported no change in quality of life, while 35.7% had mild and 31.4% had moderate improvement. A history of atopic disease was present in 55.7% of patients, who had significantly higher daytime sleepiness scores than those without (p = 0.045). In CSU patients, while omalizumab improves symptoms and quality of life, psychological distress persists in substantial subsets, highlighting the need to address mental health and lifestyle factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40244437What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.