ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Lymphatic vessel imaging-Indications and clinical applications].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe armamentarium of lymphatic imaging techniques and treatment concepts available at specialized centers has significantly increased in recent years. The rarity and complexity of lymphatic vascular diseases presents the particular challenge of implementing these methods in a meaningful and targeted manner in patient care; however, there are currently no generally accepted diagnostic guidelines.
objectiveWhich lymphatic imaging technique is useful in which clinical situations? MATERIAL AND
methodsThis article provides an overview of clinical and technical considerations that are relevant for a targeted evaluation of indications for lymphatic imaging in a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
resultsThe lymphatic vascular system can be affected by a wide range of primary and secondary pathologies, which often lead to relatively uniform clinical presentations (especially localized swellings, chylolymphatic effusions). In general, dedicated imaging should be discussed if a lymphatic vascular disease is suspected based on such a typical presentation. The choice of imaging strategy is then individually determined by the urgency of treatment, suspected localization and etiology of the pathology, comorbidities, specific properties of the imaging techniques, the treatment strategy pursued and local availability. When interpreting imaging and planning treatment, in addition to the large spectrum of different pathologies, the individual variability of the lymphatic system must also be taken into account.
conclusionAn individual pretherapeutic assessment of lymphatic flow should nowadays be mandatory in order to be able to optimize the therapeutic approach for each patient with a suspected lymphatic vascular disease. Interdisciplinary patient care is of decisive importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40244423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.