Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244423›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Lymphatic vessel imaging-Indications and clinical applications].

Claus C Pieper

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Claus C PieperSektion für minimal invasive Lymphgefäßtherapie, Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. claus_christian.pieper@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe armamentarium of lymphatic imaging techniques and treatment concepts available at specialized centers has significantly increased in recent years. The rarity and complexity of lymphatic vascular diseases presents the particular challenge of implementing these methods in a meaningful and targeted manner in patient care; however, there are currently no generally accepted diagnostic guidelines.

objectiveWhich lymphatic imaging technique is useful in which clinical situations? MATERIAL AND

methodsThis article provides an overview of clinical and technical considerations that are relevant for a targeted evaluation of indications for lymphatic imaging in a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

resultsThe lymphatic vascular system can be affected by a wide range of primary and secondary pathologies, which often lead to relatively uniform clinical presentations (especially localized swellings, chylolymphatic effusions). In general, dedicated imaging should be discussed if a lymphatic vascular disease is suspected based on such a typical presentation. The choice of imaging strategy is then individually determined by the urgency of treatment, suspected localization and etiology of the pathology, comorbidities, specific properties of the imaging techniques, the treatment strategy pursued and local availability. When interpreting imaging and planning treatment, in addition to the large spectrum of different pathologies, the individual variability of the lymphatic system must also be taken into account.

conclusionAn individual pretherapeutic assessment of lymphatic flow should nowadays be mandatory in order to be able to optimize the therapeutic approach for each patient with a suspected lymphatic vascular disease. Interdisciplinary patient care is of decisive importance.

Indexed as

Lymphatic DiseasesLymphatic VesselsHumansChylothoraxChylous ascitesLymphangiographyLymphatic vascular systemLymphocele

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.