ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
Combination HIV Prevention Strategies in the Lisbon Cohort of Men who Have Sex with Men: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis of Data from 2014 to 2021.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to examine how HIV prevention tools were used and how they clustered together among men who have sex with men (MSM) testing at a community-based sexual health center in Lisbon, Portugal, from 2014 to 2021. We used data from 16,780 visits from adult cisgender MSM and had an HIV-negative test result at baseline in the Lisbon Cohort of MSM-an open, prospective cohort study conducted at CheckpointLX, a community-based sexual health center tailored to MSM, from 2014 to 2021. A longitudinal clustering approach was used to identify clusters of HIV prevention (cluster package for R). Six clusters of HIV prevention were identified: condom use (9,109 visits); low or no condom use, low PrEP (preexposure prophylaxis) use (6,258 visits); anal sex abstinence (746 visits); PEP (postexposure prophylaxis) and condom use (305 visits); PEP use (186 visits); and PrEP and condom use (176 visits). Most participants were aged 24 to 34 years old, were born in Portugal, had high education, and self-identified as gay. PrEP and PEP uptake were more associated with being born in Brazil, while low prevention adherence was less associated with high education. Condom use was the most frequently reported prevention strategy, followed by the low or no condom use, low PrEP use cluster. However, participants with higher odds of reporting HIV risk behaviors were the ones allocated to clusters with reports of higher frequency of prevention tools utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.