Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244334›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2025

Assessment of abuse potential of furanylfentanyl and tetrahydrofuranylfentanyl.

Yuanyuan Chen, Miaojun Lai, Xiangyu Li, Yanling Qiao, Deli Xu, Dan Fu, Bin Di, Peng Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuanyuan ChenSchool of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Miaojun LaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Affiliated Kangning Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315201, China.
Xiangyu LiOffice of China National Narcotics Control Commission, Pharmaceutical University Joint Laboratory on Key Technologies of Narcotics Control, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yanling QiaoOffice of China National Narcotics Control Commission, Pharmaceutical University Joint Laboratory on Key Technologies of Narcotics Control, Beijing, 100193, China.
Deli XuSchool of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Dan FuDepartment of Psychiatry, Affiliated Kangning Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315201, China.
Bin DiSchool of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China. dibin@cpu.edu.cn.
Peng XuOffice of China National Narcotics Control Commission, Pharmaceutical University Joint Laboratory on Key Technologies of Narcotics Control, Beijing, 100193, China. dongwufang123@163.com.

Funding

Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provience 2022KY342National Natural Science Foundation of China 82130056Ningbo Public Welfare Research Project 2024S025Research Program on the Guiding Principles for the Formulation and Adjustment of the Control Level for Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances RS2024H006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalFuranylfentanyl and tetrahydrofuranylfentanyl (THF-F) have been emerging in numerous intoxication and overdose cases in recent years. However, there remains a data deficiency regarding the abuse potential of these novel fentanyl analogs.

objectivesThis study was designed to systematically assess the abuse potential of furanylfentanyl and THF-F.

methodsIn this study, we evaluated the abuse potential of furanylfentanyl and THF-F via the conditioned place preference (CPP), drug self-administration, drug discrimination, and naloxone-precipitated withdrawal experiments with fentanyl as a reference.

resultsResults from CPP experiments indicated that furanylfentanyl and THF-F could induce CPP at minimum doses of 0.1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg, respectively. These doses were 1 time and 30 times that of fentanyl (0.1 mg/kg). Furanylfentanyl elicited stable self-administration responses at 2.5 µg/kg/infusion, whereas THF-F did so at 50 µg/kg/infusion. In the drug-substitution test, furanylfentanyl and THF-F induced the maximum number of infusions at 1.10 µg/kg and 12.5 µg/kg, respectively, which were 1 time and 10 times that of fentanyl (1.21 µg/kg). In drug discrimination tests, all three substances were fully substituted for the discriminative-stimulus effects of heroin dose-dependently. The substitution potency of furanylfentanyl (ED

conclusionsTaken together, our study presented new evidence indicating that furanylfentanyl and THF-F exhibit significant abuse potential in rodent models, which provides experimental data for the control. Furthermore, our study offered valuable information for future studies into the addictive properties of structurally modified fentanyl analogs.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidFentanylFuransOpioid-Related DisordersAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugMaleMiceNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylFuransfuranyl fentanylNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsConditioned place preferenceDrug discriminationFentanylFuranylfentanylNaloxone-precipitated withdrawalSelf-administrationTetrahydrofuranylfentanyl

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.