ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Supporting wellness after cancer treatment for women from Chinese, Vietnamese, and Arabic backgrounds: a qualitative study of healthcare provider views.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOver one million Australians live with a cancer diagnosis, with nearly a quarter speaking a language other than English. Cancer survivors from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds often face significant unmet needs during survivorship, including navigating the healthcare system and accessing culturally appropriate support. For example, Chinese- and Vietnamese-speaking survivors report physical and psychosocial impacts, compounded by limited availability and access to tailored information on symptom management and recurrence prevention. This study aimed to explore healthcare providers' perspectives on designing supportive care programs for women cancer survivors from Vietnamese, Arabic, and Chinese-speaking backgrounds, focusing on culturally appropriate content, delivery formats, and barriers and facilitators to engagement.
methodThirteen healthcare providers experienced in cancer survivorship and supportive care for CALD women participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited from healthcare settings in Western Sydney, a culturally diverse region, using purposive sampling to ensure diverse professional perspectives. Interviews were guided by an advisory committee, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using NVivo.
resultsThree key areas were identified: program content, delivery preferences, and barriers/enablers. A holistic approach addressing physical, emotional, and social dimensions was recommended, incorporating culturally tailored guidance on diet, exercise, and mindfulness. Non-hospital, community-based settings were favored for accessibility and comfort, with a stepped-care model offering varying levels of support based on individual needs. Challenges included language barriers, privacy concerns, and logistical issues, while facilitators encompassed culturally sensitive outreach, community partnerships, and bilingual facilitators. Participants emphasized the importance of low-cost programs with flexible delivery formats.
conclusionsThis study provides valuable insights from healthcare providers on the design of culturally and linguistically tailored supportive care programs for women cancer survivors from Vietnamese-, Arabic-, and Chinese-speaking backgrounds. Providers emphasized the importance of a holistic approach addressing physical, emotional, and social needs, with delivery in accessible, community-based settings. Key recommendations included culturally sensitive outreach, bilingual facilitators, and flexible, low-cost program options to overcome barriers such as language, privacy concerns, and logistical challenges. These programs have the potential to advance health equity by improving survivorship experiences and outcomes for culturally diverse women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.