ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Do Nitrosative Stress Molecules Hold Promise as Biomarkers for Multiple Sclerosis?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Reductive Stress Nexus: Integrated Pathways of Metabolic Dysregulation, Senescence and Blood-Brain Barrier Failure in Neurodegenerative Disease and Brain Aging.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Nitric oxide in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration: dual roles, inflammasome crosstalk, and biomarker opportunities.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Oxidative Stress in Migraine-Effect or Cause?Genes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS), an auto-immune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with inflammatory and neurodegenerative properties, remains an insufficiently understood disease despite more than 150 years of research. In contrast to diseases from other medical fields such as, for instance, oncology, a description of its clinical and non-clinical features based on readouts such as biomarkers is still in its infancy. While, in this regard, neurofilament light chain (NfL) seems to be a promising new tool, the significant intra- and interindividual variation of this serological marker somewhat limits its widespread applicability in everyday clinical reality. This has sparked novel studies in which glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was proposed as an on-top marker serving to improve overall specificity. In this context, it was found that MS disease progression was significantly more often associated with increased levels of both NfL and GFAP compared to increased NfL levels alone. This highlights the complexity of the disease while also emphasizing the potential benefits of introducing additional markers to enhance current options. We propose that nitrosative stress markers, such as nitrate, nitrite, and nitrotyrosine (3NT), could serve this purpose effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.