Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40244277›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Affinity Electrophoresis of Proteins for Determination of Ligand Affinity and Exploration of Binding Sites.

Patrick Masson, Tatiana Pashirova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick MassonInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., 420008 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7837-3662
Tatiana PashirovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., 420008 Kazan, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2001-1570

Funding

Kazan Federal University Prioritet 2030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affinity gel electrophoresis was introduced about 50 years ago. Proteins interact with a ligand immobilized in the support. Specific interactions cause a decrease in electrophoretic mobility. The presence of a free ligand, competing with an immobilized ligand, restores electrophoretic mobility. In affinity capillary electrophoresis, the ligand is mobile, and its interaction with a specific protein changes the mobility of the protein-ligand complex. This review mostly focuses on gel affinity electrophoresis. The theoretical basis of this technique, ligand immobilization strategies, and principles for determination of ligand affinity are addressed. Factors affecting specificity and strength of interactions are discussed, in particular, the structure of the affinity matrix, pH, temperature, hydrostatic pressure, solvent, co-solvents, electric field, and other physico-chemical conditions. Capillary affinity electrophoresis principles and uses are also briefly introduced. Affinity gel electrophoresis can be used for qualitative and quantitative purposes. This includes detection of specific proteins in complex media, investigation of specific interactions, protein heterogeneity, molecular and genetic polymorphism, estimation of dissociation constants of protein-ligand complexes, and conformational stability of binding sites. Future prospects, in particular for screening of engineered mutants and potential new drugs, coupling to other analytical methods, and ultra-microtechnological developments, are addressed in light of trends and renewal of this old technique.

Indexed as

ProteinsBinding SitesElectrophoresis, CapillaryHumansLigandsProtein BindingLigandsProteinsaffinity capillary electrophoresisaffinity electrophoresisdissociation constantpolyacrylamide gelprotein–ligand interactions

Identifiers

PMID40244277
PMCPMC11989713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.