ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Prospective Upfront Next-Generation Sequencing for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Outcomes from the Ion Chiricuță Oncology Institute.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the Scan: Adapting Multimodal Lung Cancer Screening for Central and Eastern Europe-Overcoming Systemic Barriers and Epidemiological Confounders.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Upfront Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is increasingly recommended in advanced NSCLC to guide targeted therapy. This prospective single-center study in Romania evaluated routine, upfront NGS in advanced NSCLC at baseline (tissue and/or liquid) and progression (liquid). Baseline FoundationOne NGS (tissue/liquid) was performed in 119 consecutive stage IV NSCLC patients, along with PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC, SP263). Liquid biopsy was repeated at progression. Turnaround time (TAT), the prevalence of actionable targets, and clinical utility were assessed. Patients were predominantly male (68.1%) with a median age of 62 years (range 30-86). Most had ECOG PS 0-1 (79%) and non-squamous histology (67.2%). Never-smokers accounted for 25.2%. The median TAT for the NGS results was 9 days (range 5-21). Overall, 671 genetic alterations were detected in 149 genes. The mean number of distinct mutations per patient dropped from 5.6 at baseline to 4.3 at progression. Tissue samples yielded more alterations (6 per patient) than baseline liquid biopsies (4.6). Squamous tumors had more alterations (7.1 vs. 4.8 in non-squamous), and the number of smokers exceeded that of never-smokers (6 vs. 4.5). TP53 was the most frequent (70.59%). Actionable variants were found in 74.8% of patients, though only 35.3% received personalized therapy, largely due to performance status deterioration, reimbursement, or trial availability barriers. Common targets in non-squamous tumors included EGFR (21%), KRAS G12C (11%), NF1 (11%), and ERBB2 (6%); in squamous tumors, common targets included NF1 (24%), PIK3CA (18%), and ERBB2 (8%). Among smokers, driver mutations were often NF1 (15%), PIK3CA (11%), KRAS G12C (9%), and ERBB2 (8%); never-smokers were dominated by EGFR (45%), NF1 (15%), and KRAS G12C (8%). TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb was seen in 26.9%; no patients were MSI-H. PD-L1 TPS was <1% in 33% of patients, 1-49% in 20%, ≥50% in 18%, and unknown in 29%. Upfront NGS offers rapid, comprehensive genomic data, guiding tailored therapies and trials in advanced NSCLC. Liquid rebiopsy at progression further refines treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.