ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Impact of Patient Profile on CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy Outcomes: A Real-World Data Analysis.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Special Issue "Molecular Research and Cellular Biology of Breast Cancer".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Machine learning and cox model-based prediction of CDK4/6 inhibitor outcomes in HR+/HER2 - metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter real-world study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Real-world efficacy and prognostic factors of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HRTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. However, their efficacy is influenced by various clinical and biological factors, including patient age, tumor biology, and treatment-related toxicities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of demographic, clinical, and tumor-related characteristics on the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in a cohort of patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. We conducted a retrospective cohort study analyzing the outcomes of 95 patients with metastatic ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib, palbociclib, and abemaciclib) in combination with endocrine therapy. The patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment regimens were examined, with a primary focus on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time on treatment (TOT), and the influence of clinical and biological factors. Younger patients (under 50 years) demonstrated higher tumor aggressiveness, reflected by higher Ki67 levels and histological grades, which negatively impacted their survival outcomes. Ribociclib was associated with the highest survival benefit, particularly in younger patients. Older patients (over 50 years) showed greater rates of comorbidities and toxicity, with dose reductions correlated with improved survival outcomes. This study highlights the significance of personalized treatment strategies based on patient age, comorbidities, and tumor biology. Ribociclib shows superior efficacy in younger, less comorbid patients, while palbociclib remains a viable option for older patients with higher comorbidity burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.