ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Microbiota of Healthy Dental Pulp Under the Omics Loupe.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative pilot study of three commercial kits for bacterial DNA extraction from human subgingival biofilm samples collected with a single paper point.Journal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to contribute to the understanding of the dental pulp microbiome through metataxonomic analysis of pulp tissues from clinically healthy impacted third molars in 17 patients. Samples from coronal pulp, outer radicular dentin, and negative controls were included. Each sample was spiked with a known bacterial standard. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA V3-V4 region revealed similarity in bacterial taxonomic profiles. The bacterial DNA was detected in all pulp samples, primarily originating from reagent contaminants. Although some oral taxa appeared more abundant in pulp than in dentin or controls, contaminant species overwhelmingly dominated. Most of the extracted DNA was of human origin, rather than bacterial. Our findings question the concept of a core microbiome in healthy pulp and highlight the critical need for rigorous controls in pulpal microbiome studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.