ArticleJournal of animal science2025
In vitro fermentation potential of undigested dietary protein.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the in vitro fermentation potential of ileal digesta from pigs fed 7 protein sources with different batches-maize germ meal (MGM), cottonseed meal (CSM), rapeseed cake (RSC), rapeseed meal (RSM), peanut meal, soybean meal (SBM), and sunflower meal (SFM)-to assess their potential impact on hindgut protein fermentation, which can be harmful to animals. Ileal digesta samples were incubated with porcine fecal inoculum under N-free conditions, with whey protein isolate (WPI) as a control. Gas production (GP) resulting from protein fermentation was monitored over 48 h and analyzed using a modified biphasic model to assess substrate fermentation and microbiota turnover dynamics. Significant variations in fermentation characteristics, including maximum GP rates (Rmax), cumulative GP, and microbiota turnover slopes, were observed across the protein sources. Rmax values ranged from 16.8 ± 0.6 to 27.9 ± 0.8 mL/h for MGM and SFM, respectively compared to 12.5 ± 0.4 mL/h for WPI. Solubility and molecular mass analyses showed differences in the proportion of insoluble nitrogenous molecules and the distribution of soluble molecules, reflecting varying fermentability. Standardized hindgut fermentation potential differed significantly among the protein sources, with MGM exhibiting the highest potential (1.18 L/g dietary protein) and SBM the lowest (0.46 L/g dietary protein). These findings provide valuable insights into the differential accessibility of undigested protein to hindgut microbiota, contributing to more effective diet management and optimization of animal and human nutrition strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.