ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate individual and contextual factors associated with orofacial dysfunction in schoolchildren. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 739 children eight to ten years of age. The children answered questionnaires addressing orofacial dysfunction and anxiety. Guardians provided information on sociodemographic characteristics, sleep disturbances, and family cohesion. Examiners investigated the presence of orofacial dysfunction, dental caries, malocclusion, and traumatic dental injuries (Andreasen criteria) (Kappa>0.80). The type of school and average monthly income of the school neighborhood were the contextual variables. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize the sample. Unadjusted and adjusted (p <0.05) multilevel Poisson regression models were run. The prevalence of orofacial dysfunction was 33.3%. After adjustment by the contextual variables, a lower family income, a larger quantity of carious teeth, the presence of traumatic dental injury, severe/very severe malocclusion, the presence of sleep disturbances, and anxiety remained associated with orofacial dysfunction, whereas definite malocclusion was a protection factor. In terms of context, attending a public school was associated with orofacial dysfunction. Orofacial dysfunction was influenced by a lower family income, a larger quantity of carious teeth, and the presence of traumatic dental injury, sleep disturbances, and anxiety. Moreover, attending a public school was the contextual determinant that played a significant role in the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.