Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40243872›Full record

ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025

In vitro evaluation of the enhancement of glass ionomer cement features by using chitosan and nanodiamond.

Murilo Henrique Torres da Silva, Henrico Badaoui Strazzi-Sahyon, Renata Gallo, Ticiane Cestari Fagundes, André Luiz Fraga Briso, Victoria Tamara Perchyonok, Paulo Henrique Dos Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Murilo Henrique Torres da SilvaDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-2829-5735
Henrico Badaoui Strazzi-SahyonDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7014-0437
Renata GalloDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-4915-7200
Ticiane Cestari FagundesDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-0498
André Luiz Fraga BrisoDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6126-1760
Victoria Tamara PerchyonokVTPCHEM PTY LTD, Department of Research and Innovations, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1218-1852
Paulo Henrique Dos SantosDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4100-5153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of chitosan and nanodiamond incorporation on the surface, optical, and mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement. Total 56 samples (5 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness) were prepared and divided into 4 groups according to the incorporation of chitosan and nanodiamond on Fuji II glass ionomer cement: Control group: no incorporation; 10%CH group: incorporation of 10% chitosan; 10%ND group: incorporation of 10% of nanodiamond; 5%CH-5%ND group: incorporation of 5% chitosan and 5% nanodiamond (n=14). Analyses of color stability, surface roughness, fluorescence intensity, microhardness, morphology, and chemical composition were investigated. Additionally, water sorption, hygroscopic expansion, contact angle, surface free energy, and total free energy of interaction were also assessed. After the initial readings, the samples were individually stored in red wine solution for 28 days. Data were subjected to ANOVA followed by Tukey´s test (α=.05). Aging in wine solution altered the optical, mechanical, and surface properties of glass ionomer cement regardless of the incorporation of the compound (P<.05). 10% chitosan-incorporated glass ionomer cement promoted higher color alteration, surface roughness, and water sorption after aging (P<.05). 10% nanodiamond-incorporated glass ionomer cement showed higher microhardness compared to the other groups before aging (P<.05), however there were no differences among them after aging (P>.05). In general, no differences between the 5% chitosan- and 5% nanodiamond-incorporated glass ionomer cement and control groups were noted on the evaluated analyses (P>.05). Thus, the incorporation of 5% chitosan and 5% nanodiamond is a satisfactory alternative for maintain the surface, optical, and mechanical properties of the glass ionomer cement.

Indexed as

ChitosanGlass Ionomer CementsNanodiamondsHardnessIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingSurface PropertiesChitosanGlass Ionomer CementsNanodiamonds

Identifiers

PMID40243872
PMCPMC11996155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.