ArticleBrazilian dental journal2025
Bond strength between acrylic resin and artificial tooth treated with experimental silane with thio-urethane.
Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This in vitro study evaluated the bond strength between thermo-activated acrylic resin and artificial tooth treated with experimental silane incorporated with thio-urethane. Artificial molar teeth were individually fixed in 50mm long cylindrical wax sticks and traditionally included in metal flasks with type III plaster coated with laboratory silicone. The tooth/wax sets were removed from the flask, the tooth separated from the wax stick, and the fitting area was cleaned with household detergent. Teeth were separated into three groups according to fitting area treatments (n=10): CON (Control, no treatment or silane application), ABR (Abrasion with diamond tip), and JAT (Blasting with 50μm aluminum oxide particles). Tooth fitting area treatment was associated with PALABOND commercial silane application (PS) or experimental silane incorporated with thio-urethane (ES). Teeth were replaced in the plaster mold, and the acrylic resin traditionally flask pressed and polymerized in a heated water bath. Tooth/resin sets were individually fixed in rigid PVC tubes with chemically activated acrylic resin, leaving a space of 1 mm between the tooth/PVC tube top, and submitted to the shear strength test in a universal test machine. Shear strength data were evaluated for normality, and subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%). JAT+PS showed greater strength followed by ABR+ES. CON and JAT+ES showed lowest values and ABR+PS was intermediate. In conclusion, the artificial teeth treatments with experimental silane incorporated with thio-urethane associated with blasting or abrasion promoted different strength values when bonded to acrylic resin for denture base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.