Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40243852›Full record

Trial reportArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2025

Patisiran Treatment in the Brazilian Subpopulation of the Phase 3 APOLLO-B Study in Transthyretin Amyloidosis with Cardiomyopathy: Post Hoc Analysis.

Claudio Tinoco Mesquita, Pedro Schwartzmann, Edileide Barros Correia, Marcus V Simões, Andreia Biolo, Daniel Rodriguez Duque, Patrick Y Jay, Fábio Fernandes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03997383 (APOLLO-B), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03997383 phase3completednot on this map

APOLLO-B: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Patisiran in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Cardiomyopathy (ATTR Amyloidosis With Cardiomyopathy)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlnylam PharmaceuticalsRan2019 to 2025Enrolled360ConditionsTransthyretin Amyloidosis (ATTR) With CardiomyopathyArmsPlacebo, Patisiran
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudio Tinoco MesquitaHospital Pró-Cardíaco, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brasil.
Pedro SchwartzmannUnimed Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP - Brasil.
Edileide Barros CorreiaInstituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.
Marcus V SimõesUniversidade de São Paulo Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP - Brasil.
Andreia BioloUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil.
Daniel Rodriguez DuqueAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts - EUA.
Patrick Y JayAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts - EUA.
Fábio FernandesInstituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-8805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatisiran rapidly knocked down transthyretin and preserved functional capacity in patients with transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) in the global Phase 3 APOLLO-B study (NCT03997383).

objectivesTo evaluate patisiran efficacy and safety in post hoc analysis of the Brazilian subpopulation of APOLLO-B.

methodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to patisiran 0.3 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline (CFB) in functional capacity (6-minute walk test [6MWT]) at Month 12. Secondary endpoints included CFB to Month 12 in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) score. Exploratory endpoints included CFB in cardiac biomarkers and Perugini grade of cardiac uptake during technetium-99m scintigraphy.

resultsForty-two patients enrolled in Brazil (patisiran, n=20; placebo, n=22). Patisiran showed benefit in 6MWT and KCCQ-OS scores vs. placebo; CFB (95% confidence interval [CI]) in 6MWT (median) and KCCQ-OS scores (least squares mean) was -2.0 m (-58.5, 42.9) and 9.37 (1.93, 16.81) points with patisiran vs. -30.1 m (-72.2, 3.5) and 2.62 (-4.68, 9.92) points for placebo. For cardiac biomarkers, the mean fold-change from baseline (95% CI) for N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin I was 1.31 (1.06, 1.61) and 1.12 (0.94, 1.34) for patisiran, and 1.71 (1.39, 2.10) and 1.28 (1.08, 1.53) for placebo, respectively. Perugini grade improved in 11/18 (61.1%) and 0/10 evaluable patients with patisiran and placebo, respectively. There were no deaths in the patisiran group vs. 3 in the placebo group.

Indexed as

Amyloid Neuropathies, FamilialCardiomyopathiesAgedBiomarkersBrazilDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsRNA, Small InterferingTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWalk TestBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainpatisiranPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)RNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID40243852
PMCPMC12107767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.